← Back to the simulator
Beta version · method

How it's calculated

The data, assumptions and rules behind the simulator, so that anyone can check them and discuss them.

Last updated: October 26, 2026

The essentials

In short

“You Make the Budget” is a free, ad-free citizen simulator. Anyone can build the federal budget from real measures, costed and sourced, and see the effect of their choices on the deficit and the debt in fiscal year 2036.

The starting point

Starting data (fiscal year 2027)

ItemValue usedSource
Federal revenue$5,815 billionCBO, February 2026 ($5,885 billion), minus about $70 billion of tariff revenue (CBO, August 2026)
Federal outlays$7,782 billionCBO, February 2026 ($7,772 billion), plus about $10 billion of interest
Deficit$1,967 billion · 5.9% of GDPTool calculation
Gross domestic product (GDP)$33,315 billionCBO, February 2026
Debt held by the public, end of 2027102.7% of GDPCBO (102.1%), plus the larger-than-projected 2026 deficit and the tariff update
Net interest≈ $1.1 trillion · 3.4% of GDPCBO, February 2026

The federal budget covers Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid as well as everything Congress funds each year. States and cities run their own budgets, which are not included.

Assumptions

Growth assumptions

The visitor chooses one of three assumptions. “Nominal” growth includes inflation: it is what makes GDP, taxes and spending grow.

AssumptionWhat it assumesNominal growth used, 2028-2036
CBO (default)Real growth of 1.8% a year on average, inflation of about 2%.≈ 3.8% a year
AdministrationReal growth of 3.0% a year, as assumed in the President's FY2027 budget, inflation of about 2.1%.≈ 5.1% a year
CautiousReal growth of 1.5% a year, the low end of Federal Reserve officials' long-run range, inflation of 2%.≈ 3.5% a year

All three start from the same 2027 deficit, 5.9% of GDP.

Why 3% of GDP?

The United States has no legal limit on the deficit. The 3% mark used by the simulator is a target with support from both parties: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has made it the goal of his “3-3-3” plan, and resolutions introduced in 2026 in the House and the Senate by Republicans and Democrats call for keeping the deficit at or below 3% of GDP; economists from both sides, such as Jason Furman and Jared Bernstein, have backed it. With debt around 100% of GDP and nominal growth near 4%, a 3% deficit would bring the debt down slowly compared with the economy. The tool shows it as a reference, not as an obligation.

The engine

The calculation, year by year

The simulator moves forward from 2028 to 2036. Each year:

  1. GDP grows according to the chosen assumption.
  2. Measures phase in. A measure has half its effect in 2028, then its full effect. Defense, Social Security and measures flagged as gradual phase in over four years.
  3. The effort is counted net of effects on the economy: the share lost for each item is removed (see below).
  4. The economy slows by about half of the effort: an effort of one point of GDP lowers GDP by about half a point. This weighs on the deficit and debt ratios.
  5. The average interest rate on the debt changes: each year about 14% of the debt is repriced. The average rate moves gradually from 3.4% to about 4.2%, the average rate on new borrowing (CBO projections).
  6. The deficit adds to the debt, and each year's interest adds to the deficit: the “snowball” effect.

With no new measures, the deficit excluding interest follows CBO's baseline: it falls a little, by about 0.3 point of GDP by 2036, mainly because spending decided each year by Congress grows with inflation rather than with the economy, while Social Security and Medicare grow faster. Provisions scheduled to expire under current law expire as planned, as in CBO's baseline. With CBO's assumption, the deficit would reach about 6.9% of GDP in 2036 (CBO, adjusted for tariffs: about 6.9%), and the debt about 124% of GDP (CBO, adjusted: about 122.5%; the tool's simplified model is slightly higher).

In formulas

For year k (k = 1 in 2028, k = 9 in 2036), with g the nominal growth rate and Ef, Eg the net efforts (fast and gradual) in 2027 billions of dollars:

Potential GDP Y*ₖ = 33,315 × (1 + g)ᵏ Effort (share of GDP) eₖ = [ E_f × (0.5 if k = 1, else 1) + E_g × min(1, k/4) ] / 33,315 Actual GDP Yₖ = Y*ₖ × (1 − 0.5 × eₖ) Average rate aₖ = aₖ₋₁ + 0.14 × (4.2% − aₖ₋₁), a₂₀₂₇ = 3.4% Primary balance Pₖ = (d₀ + Bₖ − eₖ) × Y*ₖ, d₀ = 2027 deficit − 3.36% Interest Iₖ = aₖ × Dₖ₋₁ Debt Dₖ = Dₖ₋₁ + Pₖ + Iₖ, D₂₀₂₇ = 102.7% × 33,315 Results deficit = (Pₖ + Iₖ) / Yₖ ; debt = Dₖ / Yₖ

Bₖ: change in the primary deficit already built into current law (CBO baseline), reaching −$100 billion in 2027 dollars, about −0.3% of GDP, in 2036.

Key assumption

Effects on the economy

When the government spends less or taxes more, households and businesses spend less, and so pay less tax: part of the effort is lost again. Conversely, spending more or cutting taxes supports activity and brings back some revenue. The tool applies to each measure a lost share that depends on its item:

ItemShare lost
Defense; veterans; safety net; education and research; infrastructure; Medicaid45%
Social Security; Medicare; other federal programs40%
Payroll taxes35%
Corporate income tax; tariffs30%
Individual income tax; consumption and energy taxes; tax breaks25%
Investment income20%
Foreign aid; estates and great fortunes10%
Tax enforcement0%

The share is larger for public spending and payroll taxes, whose money is almost entirely spent in the U.S. economy, and smaller for taxes paid mostly by the wealthiest, who save part of their income. Foreign aid is mostly spent abroad.

The choice of economic school. These orders of magnitude follow a Keynesian approach: public spending weighs more on activity than a tax of the same amount. This choice is consistent with International Monetary Fund research showing that the effects of austerity on growth were underestimated after 2010 (Blanchard and Leigh, 2013). Other economists find, on the contrary, that spending cuts slow activity less than tax increases (Alesina, Favero and Giavazzi, 2019): with their assumptions, savings would look more effective in the simulator. CBO and the Joint Committee on Taxation use their own models, with effects that vary over time. These are averages: economists disagree on the exact size of these effects.

The results shown to the visitor always separate three amounts: the direct effect of their measures, the effect on the economy, and the real effect on the deficit.

What is counted

Scope: the federal budget

Rules

The choice of measures

What goes into the tool

A measure is included if it is backed by members of Congress, an administration, a public institution or a recognized think tank, and if its cost has been estimated publicly. The measures are chosen to cover, for each item, the range of possible choices, from large savings to large increases, or from tax cuts to tax increases. They are not meant to represent parties: you choose a measure for what it does, not for who proposes it.

Costings

The rules

Results

The profiles

The profile describes a budget strategy, not a political affiliation. It depends on the visitor's position on two axes: net spending (spending increases minus savings) and net taxes (increases minus cuts), in billions of dollars a year.

When one axis is negligible (less than $20 billion, or less than a quarter of the other), the profile follows the effect of the choices on the deficit.

Transparency

Known limits

Corrections

Beta version and corrections

Every number has been checked and sourced, but errors may remain. Does a figure, a source or a presentation seem wrong or biased? Use the “Report an error” button under each measure, or write to contact (at) youmakethebudget.org. Corrections are made as they come in.

References

Main sources

The detailed sources of each measure, with links, are shown in the simulator (the “?” button next to each measure).

Your turn!

Make my budget

Free, ad-free, no account · About us, legal notice and privacy